New order restricts phones, electronic devices in Lenoir, Greene Superior Courtrooms

A new administrative order restricts the possession and use of cell phones, smart watches, cameras and other electronic devices in Superior Courtrooms in Lenoir and Greene counties.

The order, filed June 5, took effect June 10 and applies during all terms of Superior Court in Judicial District 9A. It was entered by Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Imelda J. Pate.

According to the order, the policy is intended to prevent the recording and dissemination of images of jurors, witnesses, law enforcement officers, victims and court personnel. The order says such conduct can threaten the integrity of the judicial process, endanger lives and intimidate witnesses or jurors.

Under the order, cellular telephones, smart phones, computers, electronic tablets, cameras, smart watches, smart glasses and any other device capable of recording or transmitting sounds or images are prohibited in Superior Courtrooms in Lenoir and Greene counties, unless the person falls under an authorized exception.

Authorized persons include courthouse staff, judges and judicial support staff, licensed or practicing attorneys, law enforcement officers performing official duties, employees of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, school system employees performing official duties, government employees, expert witnesses, jurors, bail bondsmen, people professionally associated with Recovery Court, people using devices to monitor health-related issues with approval from the presiding judge, elected officials performing official duties and members of the press with approval from the presiding judge.

The order also allows a pro se litigant or party to a case to seek authorization from the presiding judge to bring a restricted device into the courtroom if it is necessary for court business.

The use of an electronic device to record or transmit sound or images during a Superior Court action involving a jury is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the presiding judge. That restriction applies to all persons, including those otherwise listed as authorized.

The order states it may be amended as necessary for enforcement.